Comments on: “High” REST http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/ AAaaaaahhhhrrrrrrr! Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:11:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Brandon Smith » REST vs. WSDL http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-6379 Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:54:04 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-6379 <p>[...] High REST: I also call this &#8220;Unicorn REST&#8221; because, in the words of Don Ferguson, this type is a little bit more common than unicorns. This is REST as laid out by Roy Fielding. It makes use of all the HTTP verbs and has a completely stateless server. Status codes are these developers best friends. [...]</p> […] High REST: I also call this “Unicorn REST” because, in the words of Don Ferguson, this type is a little bit more common than unicorns. This is REST as laid out by Roy Fielding. It makes use of all the HTTP verbs and has a completely stateless server. Status codes are these developers best friends. […]

]]> by: Chopped http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-2134 Wed, 10 May 2006 02:44:10 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-2134 <p>Yeah, but if you really want to look at "high" REST", you'll first have to remove the bongwater from under your eyelids. This will help you perpetuate a much more clear image of REST and once you have done that, "high" has already be determined. Beyond this, I see no reason to split ATOMs.</p> Yeah, but if you really want to look at “high” REST”, you’ll first have to remove the bongwater from under your eyelids.
This will help you perpetuate a much more clear image of REST and once you have done that, “high” has already be determined. Beyond this, I see no reason to split ATOMs.

]]> by: Phil Wilson http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1455 Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:06:23 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1455 <p>Yeah I know, I was just feeling picky. Sorry about that.</p> Yeah I know, I was just feeling picky. Sorry about that.

]]> by: Robert Sayre http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1349 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:36:51 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1349 <p>Phil: the AtomAPI was promoted in the same way that Atom 0.3 was. But, really, this is just politics and misses the point.</p> Phil: the AtomAPI was promoted in the same way that Atom 0.3 was. But, really, this is just politics and misses the point.

]]> by: Phil Wilson http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1348 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:29:18 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1348 <p>Unless you're suggesting everyone implement their own versions of the APP based on an incomplete spec (over a number of years so the implementations would not be interoperable), I'm not sure what the example of your mobile Atom client proves.</p> <p>In fact, if you were being picky, you <em>could</em> say that no-one has implemented the Atom API at all.</p> Unless you’re suggesting everyone implement their own versions of the APP based on an incomplete spec (over a number of years so the implementations would not be interoperable), I’m not sure what the example of your mobile Atom client proves.

In fact, if you were being picky, you could say that no-one has implemented the Atom API at all.

]]> by: Useful and Useless REST http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1341 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:44:40 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1341 <p>[...] I&#8217;ll use my first post here to repeat the ideas from Bill&#8217;s post&#8230; [...]</p> […] I’ll use my first post here to repeat the ideas from Bill’s post… […]

]]> by: Robert Sayre http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1331 Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:18:19 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1331 <p>The first public implementation I did was in <a href="http://franklinmint.fm/2004/09/27/mobile_atom.html" rel="nofollow">September of 2004</a>. It worked with public endpoints from Blogger and Typepad.</p> The first public implementation I did was in September of 2004. It worked with public endpoints from Blogger and Typepad.

]]> by: Phil Wilson http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1328 Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:00:48 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1328 <p>Given that the APP isn't finished off etc. isn't saying "The Atom protocol ... hasn’t seen wide deployment" a bit of a straw man?</p> Given that the APP isn’t finished off etc. isn’t saying “The Atom protocol … hasn’t seen wide deployment” a bit of a straw man?

]]> by: Aristotle Pagaltzis http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1327 Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:36 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1327 <p>If Mark is right, then “high” REST is really just an extension of <code>POST</code> vs <code>GET</code> (already proven) to <code>POST</code> vs all-else; that is to say, the proof is not entirely, but very nearly complete.</p> If Mark is right, then “high” REST is really just an extension of POST vs GET (already proven) to POST vs all-else; that is to say, the proof is not entirely, but very nearly complete.

]]> by: Robert Sayre http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1325 Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:37:38 +0000 http://lesscode.org/2006/03/19/high-rest/#comment-1325 <p>I'm not sure what your point is. I showed that the definition of "high" rest has no basis in reality. so... you make the call!</p> I’m not sure what your point is. I showed that the definition of “high” rest has no basis in reality. so… you make the call!

]]>